A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between potential neighbours around the development of a wall in a coastal site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case which includes captivated countrywide focus subsequent an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed family members residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of setting up breaches, environmental concerns, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier plus the Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has progressed into a highly publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around building is effective at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, seek out to create their spouse and children household. The situation is becoming emblematic of broader disputes together Ireland’s coastline, wherever advancement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of recognized people. In accordance with the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being produced by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted less than preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two citizens of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their arranging permission by building a wall past the boundaries in their site, bringing about an encroachment with a Exclusive Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, therefore places are issue to rigid controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Inside their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments might have lasting ecological effects, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal surroundings like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their scheduling permission, and say the wall, that is partly built, is in the correct placement. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion as an try to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal planning disputes, in which views of The ocean are both very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts from the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the location, In line with sworn evidence referenced from the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-high drinking water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods, a picture that has because develop into emblematic with the depth of the dispute. These steps weren't basically symbolic; they were intended to Collect visual proof of your wall’s position relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site in the sea Irish Moments described, describing how The 2 Adult males entered the h2o throughout significant weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm water to photograph the positioning grew to become Among the most placing descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that this kind of actions were cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall extended into a place affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were lined intimately from the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to know the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court heard even further submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders need to be granted to halt building pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment within the lawful timeline.
In the Main in the dispute is a disagreement around boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as made, goes further than what was permitted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been called meticulous in his assessment of preparing documents, maps, and situations connected for the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is determined by concern for environmental safety and adherence to planning law. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving A non-public view, insisting as a substitute that it is about making certain that progress at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have got described their extended-standing connection to the region as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple merely attempting to create a family members home in accordance Using the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Unique Location of Conservation and say that all operates have been performed dependant on Experienced assistance and accepted plans. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes moving into the sea for the duration of a storm, never change the fundamental details.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how preparing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute around design of wall at coastal website has become a shorthand description to get a predicament that numerous observers see as increasingly widespread. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now additional contentious.
The Irish Periods short article about René Collier observed which the businessman had Formerly been linked to community advocacy on arranging and environmental problems, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from extremely distinctive Skilled backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely Rene Collier as some experiences spell their names, have grown to be synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site in the sea Irish Instances coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments and René Collier waded through midsection-substantial water during a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting both the Bodily truth on the coastline and the symbolic character of your act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an extreme tactic.
As the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result stays uncertain. The court have to ascertain whether or not the wall as crafted complies with preparing permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging problems. Nevertheless the human component continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside each other extended once the authorized costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than development functions at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case prolong beyond that deal with. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. What's more, it underscores how quickly a local disagreement can escalate when basic troubles which include environmental defense and house rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays an area of normal natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre of your dispute stands partly developed, a physical manifestation of unresolved lawful inquiries. No matter if it is going to eventually be altered, taken off, or accomplished as planned will rely upon the court’s conclusions. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will possible continue on to appear in headlines, connected indelibly to one of the most carefully viewed preparing disputes in north Dublin recently.